9:45.Got a feel that there wasn't much argyle logic in the sudoku.It was there in bits and pieces but nevertheless the deductions were beautiful especially, the triplet along the diagonal was hard to find. No idea if my time is par or too slow.
I agree with you that the sudoku would have been better if there were some more marked diagonals. Will keep this in mind when I create argyle in future.
I think it was a bit slow solve given your level. But we should wait for some more people to solve so that we can compare.
9:45.Got a feel that there wasn't much argyle logic in the sudoku.It was there in bits and pieces but nevertheless the deductions were beautiful especially, the triplet along the diagonal was hard to find.
ReplyDeleteNo idea if my time is par or too slow.
I agree with you that the sudoku would have been better if there were some more marked diagonals. Will keep this in mind when I create argyle in future.
DeleteI think it was a bit slow solve given your level. But we should wait for some more people to solve so that we can compare.
Now it seems like you were fast ;)
Delete9:57 - slow start for me
ReplyDelete17:39, incredibly slow solve for me. Started off well, but got stuck in the middle. Took a long time to find the logic from there.
ReplyDeleteAh! Probably you took time in the top right diagonal
Delete17 mins..it was master piece
ReplyDeleteThank you, Gaurav!
Delete17.05
ReplyDelete17:50 mins
ReplyDeleteReally nice piece of construction...Enjoyed solving it
Thanks, Ramesh!
Delete